The West Virginia Board of Education plans to take legal action against Secretary of State Kris Warner after his office rejected the board’s latest policy filing under a new law that alters how education policies are approved in the state.
During a special meeting Monday, the WVBOE unanimously approved Policy 4334, which updates design and equipment standards for school transportation vehicles. The policy was then submitted to the Secretary of State’s Office, as has been the board’s standard practice. Warner’s office declined to accept the filing, citing House Bill 2755, which took effect July 11.
A WVBOE news release sent after the meeting indicated the WVBOE will pursue litigation. The pending lawsuit is expected to address the division of authority between the state board, the Legislature and other branches of government in shaping public education policy.Â
Policy process and changes
Previously, the WVBOE was the only state agency allowed to implement policies without legislative review.
In a letter to the WVBOE's attorneys, Secretary of State's Office general counsel Dave Cook described the office’s function in this process as “ministerial,†meaning it carries out duties as defined by law. A spokesperson for the office added that it is not empowered to assess the constitutionality of legislation and would withhold further comment while litigation is pending.
The board argues that HB 2755 conflicts with the West Virginia Constitution, which grants the board “general supervision of the free schools of the state.†In the Monday meeting, the state BOE's general counsel, Kelli Talbott, cited the 1988 State Board of Education v. Hechler case, in which the board successfully challenged a similar legislative attempt to assert oversight over education policy.
“The board’s position is and has been that House Bill 2755 is unconstitutional,†she said. “Indeed, you guys will recall that during the legislative session that there were legislators and legislative counsel who said as much on the floor and during committee meetings admitted it was unconstitutional.â€
Board members also pointed to two public votes rejecting expanded legislative authority over education policy, including the 2022 defeat of Amendment 4, which would have required the BOE submit its rules for legislative oversight. Amendment 4 failed in the 2022 general election by a 58% to 42% margin.
The news release from the BOE raised concerns that the new legislative approval process could delay policy implementation. It cites Policy 4334 as an example, noting that, under the new process, it would not be eligible for legislative consideration until the 2026 session. Previously, the policy could have taken effect 30 days after filing.
CLICK HERE to follow the ÂÒÂ×ÄÚÉä Gazette-Mail and receive